Measuring compliance of consent revocation on the web

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Priyadarsini, Gayatri
dc.contributor.author Bielova, Nataliia
dc.contributor.author Santos, Cristiana
dc.contributor.author Bichhawat, Abhishek
dc.coverage.spatial United States of America
dc.date.accessioned 2024-12-05T06:51:36Z
dc.date.available 2024-12-05T06:51:36Z
dc.date.issued 2024-11
dc.identifier.citation Priyadarsini, Gayatri; Goel, Dishank and Bichhawat, Abhishek, "Least privilege access for persistent storage mechanisms in web browsers", arXiv, Cornell University Library, DOI: arXiv:2411.15416, Nov. 2024.
dc.identifier.uri http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15414
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.iitgn.ac.in/handle/123456789/10819
dc.description.abstract The GDPR requires websites to facilitate the right to revoke consent from Web users. While numerous studies measured compliance of consent with the various consent requirements, no prior work has studied consent revocation on the Web. Therefore, it remains unclear how difficult it is to revoke consent on the websites' interfaces, nor whether revoked consent is properly stored and communicated behind the user interface. Our work aims to fill this gap by measuring compliance of consent revocation on the Web on the top-200 websites. We found that 19.87% of websites make it difficult for users to revoke consent throughout different interfaces, 20.5% of websites require more effort than acceptance, and 2.48% do not provide consent revocation at all, thus violating legal requirements for valid consent. 57.5% websites do not delete the cookies after consent revocation enabling continuous illegal processing of users' data. Moreover, we analyzed 281 websites implementing the IAB Europe TCF, and found 22 websites that store a positive consent despite user's revocation. Surprisingly, we found that on 101 websites, third parties that have received consent upon user's acceptance, are not informed of user's revocation, leading to the illegal processing of users' data by such third parties. Our findings emphasise the need for improved legal compliance of consent revocation, and proper, consistent, and uniform implementation of revocation communication and data deletion practices.
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by Gayatri Priyadarsini, Nataliia Bielova, Cristiana Santos and Abhishek Bichhawat
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher Cornell University Library
dc.title Measuring compliance of consent revocation on the web
dc.type Article
dc.relation.journal arXiv


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account