| dc.contributor.author |
Banerjee, Narayan |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Majumder, Barun |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2016-02-11T12:51:55Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2016-02-11T12:51:55Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2016-03 |
|
| dc.identifier.citation |
Banerjee, Narayan and Majumder, Barun, “A question mark on the equivalence of Einstein and Jordan frames”, Physics Letters B, DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.01.022, vol. 754, pp. 129-134, Mar. 2016. [To appear] |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn |
0370-2693 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.01.022 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.iitgn.ac.in/handle/123456789/2078 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
With an explicit example, we show that Jordan frame and the conformally transformed Einstein frames clearly lead to different physics for a non-minimally coupled theory of gravity, namely Brans–Dicke theory, at least at the quantum level. The example taken up is the spatially flat Friedmann cosmology in Brans–Dicke theory. |
en_US |
| dc.description.statementofresponsibility |
by Narayan Banerjee and Barun Majumder |
|
| dc.format.extent |
Vol. 754, pp. 129-134 |
|
| dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
| dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Einstein frame |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Jordan frame |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Quantum cosmology |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Schutz formalism |
en_US |
| dc.title |
A question mark on the equivalence of Einstein and Jordan frames |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
| dc.relation.journal |
Physics Letters B |
|