Assessing container network interface plugins: functionality, performance, and scalability

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Qi, Shixiong
dc.contributor.author Kulkarni
dc.contributor.author Sameer G.
dc.contributor.author Ramakrishnan, K. K.
dc.coverage.spatial United States of America
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-15T13:10:01Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-15T13:10:01Z
dc.date.issued 2020-12
dc.identifier.citation Qi, Shixiong; Kulkarni, Sameer G. and Ramakrishnan, K. K., “Assessing container network interface plugins: functionality, performance, and scalability”, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, DOI: 10.1109/TNSM.2020.3047545, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 656-671, Dec. 2020. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1932-4537
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2020.3047545
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.iitgn.ac.in/handle/123456789/6211
dc.description.abstract Kubernetes, an open-source container orchestration platform, has been widely adopted by cloud service providers (CSPs) for its advantages in simplifying container deployment, scalability, and scheduling. Networking is one of the central components of Kubernetes, providing connectivity between different pods (a group of containers) both within the same host and across hosts. To bootstrap Kubernetes networking, the Container Network Interface (CNI) provides a unified interface for the interaction between container runtimes. There are several CNI implementations, available as open-source �CNI plugins�. While they differ in functionality and performance, it is a challenge for a cloud provider to differentiate and choose the appropriate plugin for their environment. In this paper, we compare the various open-source CNI plugins available from the community, qualitatively, and through detailed quantitative measurements. With our experimental evaluation, we analyze the overheads and bottlenecks for each CNI plugin, especially because of the interaction with the datapath/iptables as well as the host network stack. Overlay tunnel offload support in the network interface card plays a significant role in achieving the good performance of CNIs that use overlay tunnels for inter-host Pod-to-Pod communication. We also study scalability with an increasing number of Pods, as well as with HTTP workloads, and briefly evaluate Pod startup latency. Our measurement results inform the outline of an ideal CNI environment for Kubernetes.
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by Shixiong Qi, Sameer G. Kulkarni and K. K. Ramakrishnan
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers en_US
dc.subject Containers en_US
dc.subject Network interfaces en_US
dc.subject Runtime en_US
dc.subject IP networks en_US
dc.subject Scalability en_US
dc.subject Cloud computing en_US
dc.subject Open source software en_US
dc.subject Container networking interface en_US
dc.subject Kubernetes en_US
dc.subject Performance en_US
dc.subject Scalability en_US
dc.title Assessing container network interface plugins: functionality, performance, and scalability en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.relation.journal IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account