A comparative study of reverse flow chromatographic reactor and fixed bed reactor: a multi-objective optimization approach

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Srivastava, Shashwat
dc.contributor.author Padhiyar, Nitin
dc.coverage.spatial United States of America
dc.date.accessioned 2023-04-13T06:14:47Z
dc.date.available 2023-04-13T06:14:47Z
dc.date.issued 2023-05
dc.identifier.citation Srivastava, Shashwat and Padhiyar, Nitin, "A comparative study of reverse flow chromatographic reactor and fixed bed reactor: a multi-objective optimization approach", Chemical Engineering Research and Design, DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2023.03.022, vol. 193, pp. 294-305, May 2023.
dc.identifier.issn 0263-8762
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2023.03.022
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.iitgn.ac.in/handle/123456789/8739
dc.description.abstract In this study, we have carried out a comparative analysis of a fixed bed reactor (FBR) and reverse flow chromatographic reactor (RFCR) for a series reaction. This comparison has been carried out using mathematical model based single and multi-objective optimization. In addition, since the model merely approximates the actual process, there is an inherent presence of uncertainty in it. To account for the uncertainty, optimization is done considering the uncertainty in the key model parameters. Three objective functions are used in this work for the comparative study, namely yield, selectivity, and conversion. The decision variables used in the optimization problem are the inlet concentration, Damkohler number, and dimensionless switching time. The multi-objective optimization results have been analysed in terms of optimal Pareto fronts for three bi-objective and one tri-objective optimization problems. A detailed analysis of the Pareto fronts for both the reactors is presented for five distinct representative Pareto points. The results of the work indicated the superiority of RFCR over FBR. In particular, a representative Pareto point solution of 3-objective problem in RFCR corresponds to 51.36% higher yield, 27.06% higher selectivity and 19.15% higher conversion as compared to FBR.
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by Shashwat Srivastava and Nitin Padhiyar
dc.format.extent vol. 193, pp. 294-305
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier
dc.subject Reverse flow chromatographic reactor
dc.subject Multi-objective optimization
dc.subject NSGA-II
dc.subject Pareto optimality
dc.subject Fixed bed reactor
dc.title A comparative study of reverse flow chromatographic reactor and fixed bed reactor: a multi-objective optimization approach
dc.type Journal Paper
dc.relation.journal Chemical Engineering Research and Design


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account