The additive-multiplicative distance matrix of a graph, and a novel third invariant

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Choudhury, Projesh Nath
dc.contributor.author Khare, Apporva
dc.coverage.spatial United States of America
dc.date.accessioned 2023-09-27T11:15:54Z
dc.date.available 2023-09-27T11:15:54Z
dc.date.issued 2023-09
dc.identifier.citation Choudhury, Projesh Nath and Khare, Apporva, "The additive-multiplicative distance matrix of a graph, and a novel third invariant", arXiv, Cornell University Library, DOI: arXiv:2309.08691, Sep. 2023.
dc.identifier.issn 2331-8422
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.08691
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.iitgn.ac.in/handle/123456789/9206
dc.description.abstract Graham showed with Pollak and Hoffman-Hosoya that for any directed graph G with strong blocks Ge, the determinant det(DG) and cofactor-sum cof(DG) of the distance matrix DG can be computed from the same quantities for the blocks Ge. This was extended to trees - and in our recent work to any graph - with multiplicative and q-distance matrices. For trees, we went further and unified all previous variants with weights in a unital commutative ring, into a distance matrix with additive and multiplicative edge-data. n this work: (1) We introduce the additive-multiplicative distance matrix DG of every strongly connected graph G, using what we term the additive-multiplicative block-datum G. This subsumes the previously studied additive, multiplicative, and q-distances for all graphs. (2) We introduce an invariant ?(DG) that seems novel to date, and use it to show "master" Graham-Hoffman-Hosoya (GHH) identities, which express det(DG),cof(DG) in terms of the blocks Ge. We show how these imply all previous variants. (3) We show det(.),cof(.),k(.) depend only on the block-data for not just DG, but also several minors of DG. This was not studied in any setting to date; we show it in the "most general" additive-multiplicative setting, hence in all known settings. (4) We compute D1G in closed-form; this specializes to all known variants. In particular, we recover our previous formula for D1T for additive-multiplicative trees (which itself specializes to a result of Graham-Lovasz and answers a 2006 question of Bapat-Lal-Pati.) (5) We also show that not the Laplacian, but a closely related matrix is the "correct" one to use in D1G - for the most general additive-multiplicative matrix DG of each G. As examples, we compute in closed form det(DG),cof(DG),k(DG),D1G for hypertrees.
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by Projesh Nath Choudhury and Apporva Khare
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher Cornell University Library
dc.title The additive-multiplicative distance matrix of a graph, and a novel third invariant
dc.type Article
dc.relation.journal arXiv


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account