Motor Adaptation Deficits in Ideomotor Apraxia

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mutha, Pratik K.
dc.contributor.author Stapp, Lee H.
dc.contributor.author Sainburg, Robert L.
dc.contributor.author Haaland, Kathleen Y.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-03-10T05:12:58Z
dc.date.available 2017-03-10T05:12:58Z
dc.date.issued 2017-02
dc.identifier.citation Mutha, P.K.; Stapp, L.H.; Sainburg, R.L. and Haaland, K.Y., “Motor Adaptation Deficits in Ideomotor Apraxia”, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society,  DOI: 10.1017/S135561771600120X, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 139-149, Feb. 2017. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1355-6177
dc.identifier.issn 1469-7661
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.iitgn.ac.in/handle/123456789/2697
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1017/S135561771600120X
dc.description.abstract Objectives: The cardinal motor deficits seen in ideomotor limb apraxia are thought to arise from damage to internal representations for actions developed through learning and experience. However, whether apraxic patients learn to develop new representations with training is not well understood. We studied the capacity of apraxic patients for motor adaptation, a process associated with the development of a new internal representation of the relationship between movements and their sensory effects. Methods: Thirteen healthy adults and 23 patients with left hemisphere stroke (12 apraxic, 11 nonapraxic) adapted to a 30-degree visuomotor rotation. Results: While healthy and nonapraxic participants successfully adapted, apraxics did not. Rather, they showed a rapid decrease in error early but no further improvement thereafter, suggesting a deficit in the slow, but not the fast component of a dual-process model of adaptation. The magnitude of this late learning deficit was predicted by the degree of apraxia, and was correlated with the volume of damage in parietal cortex. Apraxics also demonstrated an initial after-effect similar to the other groups likely reflecting the early learning, but this after-effect was not sustained and performance returned to baseline levels more rapidly, consistent with a disrupted slow learning process. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the early phase of learning may be intact in apraxia, but this leads to the development of a fragile representation that is rapidly forgotten. The association between this deficit and left parietal damage points to a key role for this region in learning to form stable internal representations. en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by P.K. Mutha, L.H. Stapp, R.L. Sainbur, and K.Y. Haaland
dc.format.extent vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 139-149
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Cambridge University Press en_US
dc.subject Reaching en_US
dc.subject Movement en_US
dc.subject Learning en_US
dc.subject Internal representation en_US
dc.subject Stroke en_US
dc.subject Parietal cortex en_US
dc.title Motor Adaptation Deficits in Ideomotor Apraxia en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.relation.journal Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account